United States lawmakers on the Home Monetary Companies Committee have demanded solutions from the heads of the Securities and Change Fee (SEC) and Monetary Trade Regulatory Authority (FINRA) concerning below what circumstances Prometheum obtained a particular function broker-dealer license (SPBD).

In separate letters dated Aug. 9, Home committee chair Patrick McHenry and 20 different members wrote to SEC chair Gary Gensler and FINRA president and CEO Robert Cook dinner. The lawmakers questioned the “timing and circumstances” of FINRA approving Prometheum’s SPBD as they have been persevering with to contemplate legislative options to regulatory gaps on digital property.

“Whereas Prometheum claims it’s the silver bullet for regulated digital asset choices, it has not but served a single buyer,” claimed the lawmakers. “It’s unclear why FINRA would have chosen to approve a agency with no working historical past and no monitor report of serving prospects over all of the functions that it has acquired.”

Associated: Blockchain Affiliation requires investigation into Prometheum over alleged ‘sweetheart’ SEC deal

Prometheum, based in 2017, had been largely unknown to many members of the crypto area previous to its co-founder and co-CEO Aaron Kaplan testifying earlier than the Home committee in June. The agency acquired an SPBD in Could, prompting many crypto advocacy teams and lawmakers to query its services, and in some instances name for an investigation.

The Home committee members requested the SEC and FINRA present paperwork and communication data associated to Prometheum’s SPBD earlier than Aug. 22. As well as, the lawmakers referred to as on FINRA to reply particular questions associated to Prometheum, alleging the agency could have had ties to the Chinese language Communist Social gathering.

Journal: Crypto regulation: Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the ultimate say?